🧠 Tribalism: The Original Social Network (Now with More Outrage)
Tribalism isn’t new. It’s ancient. Older than religion. Older than taxes. Probably older than sarcasm. It’s our species’ most reliable software—Group 1 vs. Group 2. In the early days, it made perfect sense: if someone looked unfamiliar, they might try to stab you or steal your mammoth. So your brain said, “Stick with the people who wear the same dirt and grunt the same way.”
Fast forward 50,000 years and we’re still running that same software—only now we’re divided not by mammoth pelts, but by hashtags, pronouns, podcast guests, and what kind of milk we drink. (Oat milk? You’re either saving the planet or ruining coffee, depending on your tribe.)
The scary thing about tribalism is that it doesn’t require logic. It doesn’t care about facts. It cares about belonging. About safety. About being right—even if you have to ignore everything that proves you’re wrong. Once you’re in a tribe, defending the tribe becomes more important than truth.
I once worked with two guys who refused to speak to each other because one was a “Ford guy” and the other drove a Chevy. Every conversation turned into a commercial break. They were essentially NASCAR fans re-enacting the Cold War over spark plugs.
Online, tribalism gets turbocharged. Social media doesn’t just enable tribes—it engineers them. The algorithm sees what you like, finds others who like the same nonsense, and locks you into a digital echo chamber where everyone agrees with you and anyone who doesn’t is “the enemy.”
Remember the Blue/Gold dress? That was tribalism in meme form. People were ready to fistfight over the color of polyester pixels. Imagine if we applied that passion to healthcare or education. But no—we save our energy for turf wars over Hogwarts houses and whether pineapple belongs on pizza.
George Orwell warned, “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” That’s tribalism in action. Not just loyalty, but selective deafness.
The problem isn’t that we form groups—it’s that we weaponize them. Political party? Tribe. Sports team? Tribe. CrossFit gym? Cult-turned-tribe. And once you’re inside, any dissent is treason.
And let’s be clear: this isn’t a “them” problem. This is you. It’s me. We’re all susceptible. I’ve unfollowed people just for liking Nickelback “ironically.” I once ghosted a woman because she said, “I don’t really like dogs.” (Not hate—just didn’t like them. Monster.)
We think we’re rational beings, but mostly, we’re just tribe-seeking missiles dressed in denim. We build entire identities on vibes, aesthetics, and podcast soundbites, and then feel personally attacked when someone doesn’t vibe the same way.
In the military, tribalism is dressed up as “unit cohesion.” You’re trained to see your unit as your family. And it works—until your family starts acting like the Mafia and suddenly you’re morally compromised but emotionally loyal. That’s the real danger of tribalism: it convinces you that ethics are negotiable if it protects your group.
And as long as humans feel uncertain, afraid, or alone, we’ll keep choosing tribes over truth. Because tribalism offers comfort. Clarity. Purpose. But it also builds echo chambers that sound a lot like bunkers.
☠️ Terrorism: Manufactured Monsters and Comfortable Labels
Let’s get uncomfortable.
Terrorism, as a word, does more than just describe violence—it sterilizes it. It puts a warning label on horror and lets us put it back on the shelf without touching the contents. It’s our way of saying: “These people are not like us.” Which is funny, because if history teaches us anything, it’s that they’re exactly like us—just with different branding.
Let me tell you a story.
I once sat across from a local Afghan man in a dusty tea house. He had three missing fingers from an old Soviet landmine and wore the expression of someone who’s lived through five governments and four civil wars. He told me his nephew joined the Taliban not because he was radical—but because they paid him. $100 a month and food for his family. “He was a good boy,” the man said. “But he needed to be useful.”
That stayed with me. Because it shattered the illusion that terrorists are born in dark caves chanting slogans and polishing AK-47s. They’re born in villages. In poverty. In systems that gave them no options and one very seductive narrative: “Your suffering is someone’s fault, and you can do something about it.”
We call them terrorists. They call themselves freedom fighters. Just like we did in 1776. We romanticize our own rebellions while demonizing theirs.
Do you know what makes a terrorist? Trauma. Propaganda. Tribalism. Purpose. And a convenient enemy.
When the U.S. bombs a wedding by mistake, it’s a “tragic consequence of war.” When a group retaliates, it’s “an act of terror.” The asymmetry isn’t just in the firepower—it’s in the narrative.
We forget that Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, was a decorated Army veteran. That the Christchurch shooter in New Zealand had a manifesto. That some of the deadliest mass shooters in America weren’t part of any foreign plot. They were us.
So why don’t we call them terrorists?
Because “terrorist” is a political term. A PR label. It’s who we’re allowed to hate without question. It lets us avoid empathy by declaring someone irredeemable. It’s not a word—it’s a blindfold.
And we need that blindfold, because if we took it off, we’d see a terrifying truth: that under different circumstances, with different scars, we might have made the same choices.
We’re not separated by morality—we’re separated by luck. Geography. Timing. And good marketing.
🦅 American Exceptionalism: The Marketing Campaign That Went Too Far
If America had a dating profile, it would say: “World’s Greatest Country. Likes: freedom, fast food, and telling others what to do. Dislikes: accountability and metric systems.”
American exceptionalism is the belief that we are special. Not just good—but divinely superior. Like we got a cheat code from the Founding Fathers and everyone else is just waiting for us to save them from their own mediocrity.
And it starts early. From kindergarten, we stand up, hand on heart, and pledge allegiance before we can even spell “allegiance.” We’re taught that we’re the beacon of hope, the last best chance for mankind, the Michael Jordan of countries.
But if we’re so great, why are we the only developed nation where getting sick can bankrupt you? Why do we have more guns than people, more prisons than schools, and a Congress with the approval rating of a dial-up modem?
Here’s the trick: exceptionalism isn’t about being exceptional—it’s about feeling exceptional. And feelings are easy to manipulate. Politicians pump it into speeches. Brands wrap themselves in flags. Even potato chips become patriotic. (“Freedom Flavor—now with 30% more bald eagle!”)
It’s all part of the myth: that we’re chosen, different, inherently better. That our wars are just, our systems are fair, and our history is a linear climb toward greatness—never mind the genocide, slavery, internment camps, or military coups we helped stage in countries most Americans can’t even spell.
Historian Howard Zinn said, “There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.” But we try anyway. Every year. On sale. With fireworks.
The problem with exceptionalism is that it breeds arrogance, not improvement. It’s why we don’t adopt better systems from other nations—healthcare, education, infrastructure—because “we’re America, dammit!” As if pride is a substitute for results.
I’ve seen kids in Kabul with better math skills than suburban teens with iPhones. I’ve seen Swedish hospitals where no one worries about the bill. I’ve met people in Vietnam, a country we once tried to bomb into democracy, who welcomed me with more hospitality than my neighbors during election season.
America’s greatness is real—but it’s not guaranteed. And it’s not eternal. It’s a project. A fragile, messy, beautiful experiment. But we can’t fix it if we keep pretending it’s perfect.
We are not exceptional because we say we are. We’re exceptional when we act like it.🇺🇸 Blind Patriotism: A Flag, a Firework, and a Filter for Critical Thought
There’s patriotism, and then there’s Patriotism™—the branded, performative, bumper-sticker version of love for country that looks a lot like nationalism with an energy drink addiction. Blind patriotism doesn’t ask questions; it salutes, waves a flag, posts a bald eagle meme, and assumes everything America does is blessed by divine authority and military discounts.
I once watched a guy in line at an airport berate a TSA agent for not speaking English fast enough. He had a camo hat, an American flag shirt, and a tattoo that said “No Regerts,” which felt poetic. When asked why he was yelling, he said, “Because this is America—speak the language.” The TSA agent was from Puerto Rico.
Blind patriotism is a strange beast. It insists that love means silence. That to question your country is to betray it. It’s the emotional equivalent of saying, “My mom’s the best mom in the world,” even while she’s burning the house down and blaming it on the dog.
And don’t get me wrong—I’ve served my country. I’ve been to more dusty airfields and morally ambiguous checkpoints than I care to count. I’ve saluted the flag while watching someone get medevaced. That’s real patriotism—not because of what we defend, but because we’re willing to admit what needs fixing.
But try telling that to someone who thinks patriotism means standing for the anthem and not much else. In that world, Colin Kaepernick is a traitor, but politicians who dodge war and grift taxpayer money are “strong leaders.” It’s all optics, no substance.
Mark Twain said, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” That second part is the one that never makes it onto t-shirts at Wal-Mart.
Blind patriotism also erases history. The sanitized version we teach in schools skips over the Trail of Tears, Tulsa, COINTELPRO, and pretends slavery was just a thing that happened and then poof—freedom! As if trauma doesn’t echo.
This lack of historical curiosity fuels the illusion that America is somehow exempt from the laws of consequence. We think “freedom” is a static achievement, like a diploma. In reality, it’s like fitness—you have to work at it, and it’s easy to lose if you stop trying.
I’ve had people say to me, “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?” That’s not patriotism. That’s relationship abuse disguised as loyalty. Imagine telling your spouse, “If you complain one more time about me never taking out the trash, you can just pack your bags and go live in Canada.”
A true patriot wants improvement. Not blind loyalty. Loyalty without thought is dangerous. It creates systems where no one can speak out without being labeled un-American.
And ironically, the Founding Fathers would’ve hated blind patriotism. They were rebels. Protesters. Rioters. They dumped tea into the harbor and wrote angsty letters to the King. They would’ve been called “ungrateful radicals” by today’s pundits.
So wave your flag. Love your country. But don’t mistake cheering for growth. America isn’t your high school football team. It’s a 250-year-old experiment that’s constantly on the verge of failing—and the only thing that keeps it from doing so is a nation of citizens brave enough to ask tough questions… and vote in midterms.
📱 Technological Conditioning: Pavlov’s Ghost Is in the Algorithm
We like to think we’re smarter than the dogs Pavlov trained. But have you ever felt a phantom vibration in your pocket? Or reached for your phone without knowing why? That’s not free will—that’s software addiction with a glass screen.
Once, I had a friend challenge me to a “no-phone Sunday.” It lasted 17 minutes. By then, I had already walked in circles, checked a blank notebook for notifications, and emotionally lashed out at a microwave. Turns out, detoxing from dopamine is worse than caffeine withdrawal.
Technology, like fire, was a brilliant invention. But leave it burning too long and it starts cooking your brain.
Our phones are loaded with apps designed by behavioral psychologists. Not to serve you—but to hook you. You’re not the customer. You’re the product. And your attention is the commodity. Every ping, swipe, and scroll is monetized.
You wake up. You check the weather. Then Twitter. Then TikTok. Then your email. By the time you’ve brushed your teeth, you’ve consumed more content than someone in the 1800s did in a month. We’re not absorbing knowledge—we’re absorbing noise.
And it’s not just mindless. It’s manipulative. Social media thrives on conflict. It rewards outrage. Studies show that posts with anger or fear spread faster than those with joy or nuance. Why? Because the algorithm doesn’t want you calm—it wants you engaged.
I remember watching someone cry over a video on Facebook, then immediately post a story about their lunch. The shift was instant. Grief to grilled cheese in 30 seconds. That’s emotional whiplash.
And let’s talk about surveillance. We now carry tracking devices that listen to us, analyze us, and then sell us products based on our late-night insecurities. I mentioned “anxiety” in a text once and Instagram started pushing me weighted blankets and anti-depressants disguised as herbal teas.
As Edward Snowden once said, “Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”
We’ve traded privacy for convenience. Introspection for distraction. Real connection for fake engagement.
Worst of all? We know this. And we still do it. Because the alternative—boredom, silence, being alone with our thoughts—is scarier than surveillance.
So now we’ve got kids who grow up thinking attention equals affection. Adults who think likes equal legitimacy. And a whole society that’s slowly forgetting how to just be… human.
🔮 Final Reflection: Existential Circus with Free Popcorn
So where does all this leave us? Freud would say we’re sexually repressed and projecting. Maslow would say we’re stuck on Wi-Fi instead of self-actualization. Pavlov would ring a bell and watch us drool. Crowley would probably light a joint and yell, “Do what thou wilt!” from the top of a bus.
And all of them would be right.
We are walking contradictions. Creatures with Google in our pockets and no idea how to be kind to strangers. We laugh at memes of mental illness while hiding our own behind curated feeds. We cling to ideologies we don’t fully understand just to feel something.
We burn out, check out, numb out—and then wonder why we feel so disconnected.
We have more knowledge than any generation in history. And yet, we use it to argue about whether birds are real. (Spoiler: they are. Probably.)
But here’s the weird beauty of it all: we’re aware. For the first time in history, the collective human brain can reflect on itself, write snarky blogs about its dysfunction, and still cry at dog videos two minutes later.
That’s what makes us redeemable.
We laugh, we think, we screw up, we try again. We resist. We rebel. We vote. We write. We meme. And somehow, in the midst of all that chaos, we connect—even briefly—with people who feel the same underlying absurdity.
That’s humanity. That’s the joke. That’s the hope.
So if you’re looking for meaning, here’s the best I’ve got:
The world’s a mess. So are we. But we’re in it together. And sometimes, that’s enough.
And if not?
Well, at least the popcorn’s fresh.
Leave a comment